One evolutionary explanation claims that Jealousy causes
aggression and a big cause of jealousy is cuckoldry. This is where a woman
deceives her male partner into investing in offspring conceived with another
male. Men have evolved mate-retention strategies driven by sexual jealousy to
stop this from happening to them which often involve aggression.
Camilleri (2004) devised the
cuckoldry risk hypothesis which says that men will be more willing to use
sexually coercive tactics when there is a high risk of cuckoldry. This was
backed up by Lalumiere (2005) who found that men carry out partner rape in
order to decrease paternity uncertainty.
Buss and Shackelford (1997)
conducted a study which supported the idea mate-retention strategies involving
violence have evolved in men by looking into what mate-retention strategies
occurred in married couples. Men reported a higher use of intrasexual threats
than women who were more likely to use verbal possession signals. They also
found that men with younger female partners used more mate-retention tactics
including violence and threats. This shows that mate retention strategies are
used to deter cuckoldry as men with younger female partners are most likely to
use it and they are thought the most likely to commit cuckoldry.
Another supporting study was carried
out into mate-retention strategies by Shackelford (2005) who used a survey
method to ask males about how often they used mate-retention strategies and how
often they used violent acts towards their partners. In support of the
evolutionary explanations they found that a male’s use of mate-retention
strategies and emotional manipulation correlated positively with their use of
violence against their partners.
Shackelford’s study however had a
huge metholodgical issue in the fact that his data found a correlational link.
This therefore cannot show a causal relationship between mate-retention strategies
and violence against women. Also a self-report method was used and so there is
a chance that people could have given answers they thought were social desirable
rather than truthful ones which reduces the validity of the study’s results.
Research into mate-retention also
has a very useful real world application as use of these strategies can now
alert families and friends to the fact that violence is a big possibility in
the future and therefore it is more likely it can be stopped in advance of any
violence occurring.
All research done into
mate-retention strategies has a large gender bias as it has all been focused on
males and usually on male-male and male-female mate retention and can therefore
not be generalised to other situations.
Infidelity can also be the cause
of violence and aggression in males. This is where voluntary sexual relations
take place between a married individual and someone other than their partner.
This when taken part in by a married woman can lead to cuckoldry as they then
often expect their partner to invest in any offspring that occur from the
infidelity. Camilleri and Quinsey (2009) supported Infidelity and cuckoldry
leading to aggression and violence when they found that men convicted of
partner rape where more likely to have experienced infidelity and/or cuckoldry
prior to this occurring than those who were convicted of non-sexual partner
abuse. This would support aggression as an evolutionary response as the males
are trying to stop cuckoldry which would cause them to invest all their
resources in another man’s genes rather than his own which would have been
terrible for our ancestors in our EEA.
The evolutionary explanation also
fails to say why some cultures require male violence for social status whereas
in other cultures it damages this. If aggression was the result of evolution
surly it would be universal which suggests that there may be more complex
factors involved in aggression, such as genetic or neural factors rather than
just evolutionary ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment